WARNING: This is a rant. Rules of fairness and objectivity no longer apply.
I hate Paste Magazine. Well, hate’s a strong word, but I’ve decided I don’t like it.
I paid $1 for a 1-year subscription to it, thinking, “Well, what’s to lose for just a single buck?” I’m glad I didn’t pay much more because after almost a year I’ve decided I don’t care for it. Sure, there are good parts to it, but I’ll put those in my “I Love Paste Magazine” post when I get around to it.
What’s not to like in a magazine touting iteslf as finding “signs of life in music, film, and culture”? Well, it’s thin, pathetically thin. The articles are mostly boring. Many of the reviews are unintelligent, overly-snobbish, and miniscule (not that my little line there wasn’t).
What finally forced me to give in and realize I can’t stand the magazine was a recent review of Joe Pug’s EP Nation of Heat. Not only does the review tell you nothing about the EP other than the fact that “it sounds like there’s something in Joe Pug’s mouth,” it’s pathetically short – a mere 62 words.
First, I’d like a little more about the music than a scant Junior High essay answer, and second, I don’t care that much about Joe Pug’s lisp. Sure, I want to know he’s got a lisp, but surely there’s something more interesting about the album than that.
Too many of the reviews are written like a roomful of music (or film) snobs constantly snickering at how they can throw random words in to sound smarter than they are. What the heck does “out-of-vogue unkempt mops of hair” mean? Who knows what “chaw” is? And why might it be in Joe Pug’s mouth? What, exactly, are the “ubiquitous string arrangements” and “thick gloss of reverbed guitars” that Copeland employs on their latest album?
How about some reviews that people can understand?
I paid $1 for an annual subscription to the magazine plus a monthly CD with “the best” new music, according to Paste editors. I read the magazine and usually get either 1) bored or 2) annoyed at the obsessive use of “I’m smarter than you” adjectives. I listened to the CDs for a while, but there hasn’t been much good really so I usually just pop ‘em on the shelf and ignore ‘em.
For a magazine that should be insanely cool, it’s really lame.
Ask me tomorrow and I may have better stuff to say, but for right now, I’m tired of the ubiquitousness of it all.
Note: on further review, Joe Pug’s lisp is pretty strong.

16 comments
Comments feed for this article
October 23, 2008 at 3:12 am
ColbyPants
I dont know anything about paste magazine (i was actually doing a google search on the magazine), and pretty much hate Copeland’s CDs (though they are better live), but I can help you with one thing:
“chaw” is slang for various types of chewing tobacco, and so logically it would be in ones mouth.
October 23, 2008 at 9:27 am
jakestimp
Thanks for the help.
October 23, 2008 at 9:56 am
DavidG
Keep up the great work, Mr Blah Blah. You gave me a great laugh today!
“For a magazine that should be insanely cool, it’s really lame”… what a crack up.
October 24, 2008 at 5:56 pm
sueczech
I paid $5 for a subscription and have emailed them a few times about their reviews being over the top. Half the time I wonder if the person liked the album or not, or enjoyed using their thesaurus more.
I await your “I love Paste” blog entry.
October 24, 2008 at 10:10 pm
keith
If you don’t understand the words, you could try looking them up. The avenues for finding definitions on the Internet are quite ubiquitous.
October 25, 2008 at 9:06 pm
jakestimp
That’s really funny. Not a roll on the floor and laugh out loud kind of funny, but almost. Totally out-of-vogue though.
October 26, 2008 at 11:50 pm
Matt
I used to do a lots of reviews for a couple online sites and I’ve learned a few lessons. The main thing is not to review stuff you absolutely love or absolutely hate because your review isn’t going to be balanced. As a reviewer you end up looking like a fanboy or America’s Next Obnoxious English Critic.
I think a good number of publications fail to write honest reviews that show the reviewer respects the band and/or actually listened to the CD. There is an art to writing a good review and having class should be part of that art. So for all your scenesters writing reviews on Amazon, remember to be respectful and stop giving crappy albums five stars.
November 11, 2008 at 8:09 pm
Ten Reasons I Love Paste Magazine « The Blah Blah
[...] christian music, mp3, music, paste magazine, podcast, review, the blah blah | by jakestimp Back here, I posted on why I hated Paste Magazine, so I figured it was only right to now offer a post on why [...]
November 24, 2008 at 11:27 am
Paste *Has* Become a Terrible Magazine « What We Talk About When We Talk About Blogging
[...] November 24, 2008 · No Comments We couldn’t agree more with Eric Bescak’s assessment of how far Paste has fallen (though we might disagree with his verdict on some of the year’s top albums). Erin introduced Ben to Paste in 2002 when the magazine first launched. Granted, the layout was terrible, but the writers had a bead on the kind of music that wasn’t getting the attention it deserved from the sell-out Rolling Stone, the increasingly tepid Entertainment Weekly (now the People of entertainment magazines), or from magazines like Spin, No Depression and Magnet, which were either hit-or-miss or too niche-oriented for our tastes. Paste also included a CD sampler of new or up-and-coming artists, and you could reliably expect to find a handful of good tracks on there. We eventually became subscribers until the flame went out after a year or two. Now they’re slandering Cormac McCarthy and using phrases like “out-of-vogue unkempt mops of hair.” [...]
November 24, 2008 at 8:22 pm
Paste Magazine Must Hate Me « The Blah Blah
[...] blah | by jakestimp I’ve done two posts on Paste Magazine recently, the first called “I Hate Paste Magazine” and the second “Ten Reasons I Love Paste Magazine,” and I’ve been delightfully [...]
December 6, 2008 at 2:28 pm
SolShine7
Paste is awesome! I actually enjoy their snobbish wordplay and descriptions. It’s the best music magazine out there!
December 12, 2008 at 7:08 pm
Lena
LOL. You just made me love Paste Magazine!
Mainly, because of “out-of-vogue unkempt mops of hair” – I know exactly what it means, and importantly, I can relate – that’s a perfect description of my hair!
Thanks for the rant, it was really funny
January 23, 2009 at 3:25 pm
Carla
I have to laugh about your comment that the magazine is so then … because I just subscribed, and recently got my first issue. I was so HAPPY to see that it’s thin, because … I already subscribe to too many magazines and never have time to read them (but I LOVE magazines … ) So … I figured that since it is so thin, it’s one I might actually be able to get through every month …
January 23, 2009 at 3:26 pm
Carla
Oops … typo … first line in that comment above, then = thin
January 27, 2009 at 4:35 pm
jakestimp
March 26, 2009 at 11:15 am
Beowulf
Just spent some time enjoying your little rant and the comments. As a Bush Hater I loved your “I hate Paste” lead, I felt a weird kinship. As a former buyer and music reviewer for an independent retailer it’s refreshing to see that we music geeks don’t evolve so much as shift our POV.
The High Fidelity film held too many ‘been there’ moments for me. Still, if music stimulates your lives, and it does mine, it makes us act like we’re young geeks all the time.
By the way, Paste is weird. Carla likes them ‘thin’ and I like a disc in hand. Could be the times. Yeah, I enjoy listening to the samplers too, and so do five or more friends. You do know radio is fraked? Maybe Carla’s right, thin does fit the time.